Tuesday, April 30, 2013
Thursday, April 18, 2013
Social Psychology Videos
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Milgram's Obedience Study
The Asch Conformity Experiment
The Bystander Effect: Kitty Genovese
Prejudice: A Class Divided (Jane Elliott/ Brown Eyes v. Blue Eyes)
The Halo Effect
Monday, April 15, 2013
Stanford Prison Experiment Questions
The Stanford Prison Experiment
After visiting: http://www.prisonexp.org/ and taking the slide show, respond to the following questions.
- Was it ethical to do this study? Was it right to trade the suffering experienced by participants for the knowledge gained by the research? (The experimenters did not take this issue lightly, although the Slide Show may sound somewhat matter-of-fact about the events and experiences that occurred).
- Knowing what this research says about the power of prison situations to have a corrosive effect on human nature, what recommendations would you make about changing our correctional system?
Responses are due by 8am Wednesday 4/17/13
Tuesday, March 12, 2013
Where Are My Procrastinators?
Don't worry, there is hope! I used to be meticulous about my work. Everything was done a week in advance (if not more). Once I hit about sophomore year, I turned into a different person. All of a sudden I couldn't get myself to do anything on time. I was late to everything and every assignment I did was usually handed in just on time, or late. I thought I was just getting lazy. I used to kid around that "senioritis" came two years too early for me. Well, truth is- it didn't. In fact, just the opposite happened. What is often disregarded when seeing procrastination in those teen years is the fact that, well, the work just gets harder- as simple as that. So I found from my own experience, and now research, that procrastination cannot just be considered "laziness". One author, David McRaney, wrote that "procrastination is fueled by weakness in the face of impulse and a failure to think about thinking".
Basically, us procrastinators stink at putting aside what we want to do and because of this, get overwhelmed rather easily. We know what we have to do, but we see it as this task that can be done better at a later time, which we find out a little too late is usually not the case. Think about it like this- how many times do you put off that huge essay worth half of your grade but do your vocab homework (that would probably take just as long) the minute it is assigned? It is much easier to do the vocab homework and be sure of our grade- be sure of our answers. This is where the "failure to think about thinking" comes in. We know, that as soon as we start thinking about a topic that doesn't come easily, we often become overwhelmed. So we push it back, and push it back, and push it back, until it's the night before and we really have no choice but to "think".
After I read all of this, I felt pretty hopeless. I know I procrastinate and I know all of this is true for me, but come on, how do I fix it? Well, to my surprise, I learned this lesson from a bunch of 5-year-olds (pretty sad that they have better time management skills than me, might I add). In the late 1960s and early 1970s, Walter Mischel conducted experiments at Stanford in which he offered a bargain to children. Basically, the rules went something like this- the kids sat at a table with some treats and a bell. They could pick a pretzel, a cookie, or a giant marshmallow. They were told that they could either have the treat now or wait a few minutes, in which their payoff would be doubled and they would receive two treats. Some went for the treats after seconds and some waited a little longer.
Here's the interesting part- Michel followed these kids throughout their lives for decades (in the least creepy way possible) and found that the children that rang the bell quickly- the ones that couldn't wait- had more behavioral problems and scored an average of 210 points lower on their SATs than the children who were able to wait those 2 minutes longer. It's not that some kids were more gluttonous than the others when they were 5, it's that they were able to distract themselves. They tapped their foot, they stared at the wall, some even sang songs. They were able to trick their minds into making the wait worth it.

Our wants and desires will never go away- however, how we deal with them can always be improved. What do you think? Do you find yourself having this problem with procrastination? Do you think distracting yourself can be a helpful method?
http://youarenotsosmart.com/2010/10/27/procrastination/
Sunday, March 3, 2013
"Beauty is in the genes of the beholder"
As IHA girls, we are always busy are constantly multi tasking, with something always on our mind it is hard for us to be aware of all that is happening around us. Although we may not be cognisant of it, subconsciously our brain is analyzing our environment and this information plays a part in every decision we make. Blink also covered this topic, and we discussed in class how we can be primed in any situation to think a certain way by using enticing music, scents, or colors. The article Why We Love Beautiful Things by Lance Hosey, not only discusses how instinctively we are attracted to beautiful things, but also how our genes play a role in our decision making process. According to the article, research shows that just looking at shades of green can increase of creativity and motivation because we associate the color green with promise and nourishment. A pleasant environment has also proven to increase our productivity, and in hospitals patients who have views of landscapes have had speedy recoveries.
This article also discusses how we have a subconscious attraction to the "golden rectangle"(dimensional of about 5 by 8), many ancient building and countless of today's most popular products contain this structure. Irregular, self- similar geometry that occur everywhere in nature have universal appeal and can also be found in the pattern of leaf veins and even in our own lungs. We are subconsciously interested in things that resemble important elements from our history. These shapes are proven to reduce stress and it is believed that if these shapes are integrated into every part of our lives billions could be made.
Looking back can you attributed what seemed like an impulse buy to the ambiance of the store? What other popular products have a "golden rectangle" shape, do you believe that its shape played a role in your purchase? Do you agree with the theory that we are attracted to patterns and shapes based on our genes?
Grace Landers
Looking back can you attributed what seemed like an impulse buy to the ambiance of the store? What other popular products have a "golden rectangle" shape, do you believe that its shape played a role in your purchase? Do you agree with the theory that we are attracted to patterns and shapes based on our genes?
Grace Landers
Thursday, February 28, 2013
Sunday, February 24, 2013
Does warm weather make decision making difficult?
When you think of the affects that temperature change has on your
behavior, do your decision making abilities come to mind? According to
the article Winter Weather Wakes Up Your Mind--and Warm Weather
Makes it Harder to Think Straight, by Adrian F. Ward, higher temperatures impair our ability to
make complex decisions and cause us to shy away from making complex decisions
in the first place.
According to one study in the article, sales for scratch tickets, which require making decisions and choosing different options, reduced with every one degree
increase in temperature, while sales for lotto tickets, which require few
decisions, were unaffected. In another study, participants were asked to
proofread articles in warm and cool rooms, and the participants in the warm
rooms failed to notice half of the mistakes in the articles while the
participants in the cool rooms only failed to notice a quarter of the
mistakes.
One of the explanations given in the article is that our bodies
have to constantly regulate our internal temperature, which uses up glucose.
When we are in a warm environment and our body is trying to cool down, we
use up more energy than when we are in a cool environment and are trying to
warm up. This causes less glucose to be available for our mental processes, therefore
reducing our capacity to make complex decisions. The warmer temperatures
seem to deplete the resources needed for us to make decisions.
Despite the fact that people are better able to make complex
decisions in cooler temperatures, Ward notes that temperature only affects
decision making when the person is subject to temperature change, because humans are able to adapt to their climate. Just because a person may live
in a warmer climate does not mean that they have difficulty making complex
decisions every day.
Do you agree that temperature change can affect our decision making abilities? Do you think that living or working in a cooler climate gives a person an advantage in making complex decisions? Do you have an example of a time when your decision making abilities were affected by the temperature of your environment?
Saturday, February 23, 2013
The One Story You WON'T Tell
Everyone has embarrassing stories, whether it's the time you fell down the stairs on the way to gym class, or the day you wore two different shoes to school. Everyone likes a good laugh, too, and usually, no one has a problem with sharing their funny mishaps with others.
However, recent studies have shown that experiences that were extremely embarrassing to people are usually not told to others, as explained by Ira E. Hyman Jr., Ph.D., a professor of psychology at Western Washington University in his article, Embarrassing Memories: Sharing and Not Sharing the Self . The article explains that in an experiment, people were asked to record their daily activities in a journal, and indicate which events the person told to other people.
The results showed that the more emotional an event was, the more likely that the event was to be shared with others. However, although small embarrassments were told to others, people commonly said that they did not share overly embarrassing situations. While they did share sad stories or happy events, the humiliating experiences were left out. Although people chose not to tell others of these instances, they were not forgotten by any means. People still remember the time they were called fat or the day they were mocked for their hair, yet they will not share the story as a means of humor. Do we purposely avoid sharing stories we still feel humiliated by? Why are we still bothered by some memories, even if we have grown out of an embarrassing trait? Why do you think people can laugh about some embarrassing stories and suppress others?
However, recent studies have shown that experiences that were extremely embarrassing to people are usually not told to others, as explained by Ira E. Hyman Jr., Ph.D., a professor of psychology at Western Washington University in his article, Embarrassing Memories: Sharing and Not Sharing the Self . The article explains that in an experiment, people were asked to record their daily activities in a journal, and indicate which events the person told to other people.
The results showed that the more emotional an event was, the more likely that the event was to be shared with others. However, although small embarrassments were told to others, people commonly said that they did not share overly embarrassing situations. While they did share sad stories or happy events, the humiliating experiences were left out. Although people chose not to tell others of these instances, they were not forgotten by any means. People still remember the time they were called fat or the day they were mocked for their hair, yet they will not share the story as a means of humor. Do we purposely avoid sharing stories we still feel humiliated by? Why are we still bothered by some memories, even if we have grown out of an embarrassing trait? Why do you think people can laugh about some embarrassing stories and suppress others?
Sunday, February 10, 2013
Work Hard, Play Hard
.jpg)
Not only do we deserve this break from hard work, but this break can also benefit us in numerous ways, as Emma M. Seppala, Ph. D., describes in her article "5 Reasons to Increase Your Play in 2013".
Taking time to play can improve our creativity. We can become locked in our own thoughts and have trouble seeing things from new perspectives after long hours of work. Mark Beeman, Ph. D., Northwestern University found that people could more easily solve a puzzle after watching a comedy clip. Having fun eases tension we may feel, and allows us to think more creatively in challenging situations. In fact, in his book Play, Stuart Brown, M.D., describes how the Jet Propulsion Lab experiences difficulty in finding young engineers of the same caliber as their predecessors. The reasoning was found to be because the retirees had engaged in analytic play and as a result the lab now questions engineering candidates about their type of play in youth.
![]() |
Google's work environment is especially conducive to creativity. |
Play can also help our health. Naturally, laughter comes with play. We have fun, we joke, we laugh. Preliminary studies have shown that along with the enjoyment that comes with laughing, laughter can also improve physical health. It can improve vascular health and decrease stress and inflammation.

In our world of never ending to-do lists and responsibilities, it is so easy to forget to take time to let loose. Play may even be seen as immature or irresponsible in the face of things that seem more important. However, play is essential to our health, happiness, and creativity.
What do you think about the importance of play? Have there been any times where taking a break has helped improve your work? Are there any other benefits to play that you have experienced?
Give and You Shall Receive


Perhaps more importantly than showing the health benefits of helping, Poulin’s findings exhibit how social processes in general may influence physical health. The way we act and the choices we make in terms of interacting with other people have now been shown to play a major part in our body’s functioning. What do you think about Poulin’s findings? Have you ever thought about our emotional/social decisions playing a part on our body’s physical condition? Could you relate this study to anyone in your life?
Sunday, February 3, 2013
The Unconscious Choice
It's Sunday night--you're sitting with your laptop, aimlessly scrolling through Twitter, while you should be studying for that history test you have first period tomorrow. You begin to question how you even got in this position; what happened to your plans Friday afternoon, Saturday morning, or even a few hours ago to study? How could you have ever come to the decision that watching five hours of Friends was more important than the Great Depression? Well, new books by Dr. Gino, a psychology professor at Harvard, and the Heath brothers, who work at Stanford and Duke, explain how we end up in these situations.
We may not consciously be making these decisions, but there are underlying unconscious reasons that fuel these choices. According to Gino, we are constantly bombarded with "irrational" factors that change our mindsets. The example she gives is adding extra items to your Amazon shopping cart just to get free shipping. Then, once the object gets delivered, it gets tossed in the back of a drawer to be found on a later date. This has happened to me multiple times, before realizing what I ordered cost me more than the price of shipping.
Maybe the reason we find ourselves wondering what was going through our minds when we decided to not study, or make any other decision that strays from our original objective, is because it was not a conscious choice, but instead a choice made behind the scenes. As we read in Blink, by Malcolm Gladwell, we make unconscious decisions all the time, affected by the priming and other "irrational factors." Additionally, having too many decisions to make seems to be a pitfall for many, especially for those who (like IHA girls) do not even have time to think a certain decision through. Too many influences can fall prey to outside influences, and biological science backs this. As teenagers, our frontal lobes are still developing, and we weigh the immediate benefits of a choice more than the risk that comes with it. So maybe that's why sitting and watching just one more episode of Friends is more appealing than getting up getting our history textbook--we forget that later we'll be in the same position as every Sunday night, wondering where the weekend went.
Emotions also come into play, and we'll blame a current choice without acknowledging how we were feeling when we made that decision. When you have a bad workout, you may blame it on the fact that you went at the wrong time or you were too sore--but you fail to acknowledge that you were in a bad mood when you go there because of a fight you had with your sister before leaving. This same kind of thinking can come into play when we make decisions, and we blame the choices on external factors instead of the true culprit: our emotions.
So if you've been extremely productive each consecutive Sunday and cannot relate to the first example, think to any other decision you've made that's had you wonder, "What was I thinking?!" Can you trace back that choice to how you were feeling at that moment, or other factors that could have unconsciously influenced you? Or do you think there is a conscious aspect to this seemingly irrational decision making?
We may not consciously be making these decisions, but there are underlying unconscious reasons that fuel these choices. According to Gino, we are constantly bombarded with "irrational" factors that change our mindsets. The example she gives is adding extra items to your Amazon shopping cart just to get free shipping. Then, once the object gets delivered, it gets tossed in the back of a drawer to be found on a later date. This has happened to me multiple times, before realizing what I ordered cost me more than the price of shipping.
Maybe the reason we find ourselves wondering what was going through our minds when we decided to not study, or make any other decision that strays from our original objective, is because it was not a conscious choice, but instead a choice made behind the scenes. As we read in Blink, by Malcolm Gladwell, we make unconscious decisions all the time, affected by the priming and other "irrational factors." Additionally, having too many decisions to make seems to be a pitfall for many, especially for those who (like IHA girls) do not even have time to think a certain decision through. Too many influences can fall prey to outside influences, and biological science backs this. As teenagers, our frontal lobes are still developing, and we weigh the immediate benefits of a choice more than the risk that comes with it. So maybe that's why sitting and watching just one more episode of Friends is more appealing than getting up getting our history textbook--we forget that later we'll be in the same position as every Sunday night, wondering where the weekend went.
Emotions also come into play, and we'll blame a current choice without acknowledging how we were feeling when we made that decision. When you have a bad workout, you may blame it on the fact that you went at the wrong time or you were too sore--but you fail to acknowledge that you were in a bad mood when you go there because of a fight you had with your sister before leaving. This same kind of thinking can come into play when we make decisions, and we blame the choices on external factors instead of the true culprit: our emotions.
So if you've been extremely productive each consecutive Sunday and cannot relate to the first example, think to any other decision you've made that's had you wonder, "What was I thinking?!" Can you trace back that choice to how you were feeling at that moment, or other factors that could have unconsciously influenced you? Or do you think there is a conscious aspect to this seemingly irrational decision making?
Labels:
conscious,
decisions,
emotions,
priming,
unconscious
The Mindlessness of Technology
With
the massive outbreaks in technological advancements we’ve seen over the last decade, many are questioning if these developments can actually be
considered progress for our society; specifically, what consequences this easy
access to technology can have on our children. In the article The Tech-Savvy Child, one psychologist questions the "mindfulness" that technology possibly hinders. The
author, Jim Taylor, defines mindfulness as being able to engage fully in a situation and
receive the full benefits out of that situation; kind of like a '"carpe diem" lifestyle, one that is often associated with happier individuals.
It isn't too difficult to see that technology promotes the opposite of mindfulness, that being mindlessness. Technology is all about staying connected, creating a constant flow of information from the outside world, especially through texting and social media. The author argues that subjecting children to a continual stream of information keeps their focus off of the current moment and promotes an external view of themselves, meaning they lack abilities of self-examination and only understand themselves in regards to how others perceive them. This kind of stream, Taylor says, creates a hyper-vigilant and stressful state for kids, and prevents them from focusing on the present.
This "mindlessness" actually isn't very mindless; combined with an over-scheduled lifestyle, Taylor says kids rarely have the chance to be calm. In extreme circumstances, some children have trouble engaging in the present, leading to trouble with school, relationships, and even developmental milestones. Having the ability to simply let your mind wander is crucial to overall happiness, a state that only comes from being "mindful." In recent research, chemicals released in the brain when experiencing continuous connectivity are akin to those found in drug users and gamblers, suggesting a possible addiction of technology.
So, what do you think? Does technology promotes "mindlessness?" Do the ideas Taylor present resonate in your own life? Or should children be encouraged to be tech savvy in order to compete with a tech savvy world? How does technology help or hinder your own happiness and sense of self?
It isn't too difficult to see that technology promotes the opposite of mindfulness, that being mindlessness. Technology is all about staying connected, creating a constant flow of information from the outside world, especially through texting and social media. The author argues that subjecting children to a continual stream of information keeps their focus off of the current moment and promotes an external view of themselves, meaning they lack abilities of self-examination and only understand themselves in regards to how others perceive them. This kind of stream, Taylor says, creates a hyper-vigilant and stressful state for kids, and prevents them from focusing on the present.

So, what do you think? Does technology promotes "mindlessness?" Do the ideas Taylor present resonate in your own life? Or should children be encouraged to be tech savvy in order to compete with a tech savvy world? How does technology help or hinder your own happiness and sense of self?
Monday, January 28, 2013
Why We Love Our Pets
Have you ever
wondered how people form such close relationships with their dogs? According to
the article "Why We Love Our Pets: They're Just Like Us!", Melanie
Greenberg explains that humans become close with their dogs because we tend to
choose ones that are most like us, whether it be subliminally or intentionally.
In order to objectively study the similarities between owners and their dogs,
Greenberg looked at scientific findings and found out that some stereotypes
about pet ownership turned out to be true.
One stereotype that
was proven valid by the studies was that the more aggressive dogs belong to
aggressive owners. Studies showed that aggressive dog breeds such as
Rottweilers were most commonly owned by people who scored high on personality
assessments that tested anger, aggression and hostility. The author of this
study noted that a possibility of this could be that people who live in bad
neighborhoods are more aggressive and tend to choose guard dogs such as German
shepherds.
Another stereotype
that was proven true in a study is that dog owners and their pets look alike.
In the study, researchers found that people were able to correctly match pictures of owners to their pets two-thirds of the time. The researchers believe that this
may be an unconscious choice because humans have an "automatic distrust of
dissimilar others." In the past, humans have had a tendency to trust other
people who are similar to them and are "of their kind." Perhaps
humans have a tendency to surround themselves with familiar nonhumans as well.
The reason behind
all these similarities is simple. People tend to choose dogs that are like themselves just like we choose friends who we have similarities with. If people surround themselves with other people that are similar every day then why wouldn't
they do the same when it comes to choosing a pet? What do you think? Do you
think people tend to choose pets that are similar to themselves? If you have a
dog, do you think you chose your particular dog based on possible similarities? Do you think you are anything like your pet?
Sunday, January 27, 2013
24/6
From school, work, and college applications to sports and activities, IHA students certainly have busy lives. But is the constant activity actually hurting us rather than shortening our to-do list? In an interview with CNN Health, Dr. Matthew Sleeth explains that the mindset of 24/7 most people are living in now, is the reason our days feel too short to accomplish everything we want to. How many times have you heard someone in the hall say, “I didn’t have time to finish my homework” or “I got no sleep, I was up all night finishing my essay.” This hectic lifestyle can lead to depression, exhaustion, and anxiety, some of which we are familiar with at IHA. In his book, “24/6: A Prescription for a Happier, Healthier Life,” Dr. Sleeth explains why a “stop day” can solve most of these problems.


Dr. Sleeth
believes that by taking a “stop day,” or stopping work for a day, we can reduce
the amount of stress in everyday life and find that we really do have enough
time to finish everything we need to. Snow days will then no longer seem like a
God send and we can actually enjoy our breaks rather than just sleeping them
away. Do you think a “stop day” is realistic for an IHA student? How effective
do you think a “stop day” would be in terms of reducing stress and anxiety? Are
there other ways to reduce stress and anxiety in our life, or is the answer
really as simple as a taking a break?
Sunday, January 6, 2013
New Year's Resolutions
If you had to guess, what do you think that the top three resolutions are? According to the article, the goals to "lose weight, quit smoking and exercise regularly" are the top resolutions every year. All of these goals require people to change their behavior, so behavior psychologists use New Year's Resolutions as a way to study habits that help to change peoples behavior. The success of achieving your resolution does not depend on your goal, but instead on the actions you take.
In the article, psychology professor John Norcross shares the ways in which to have most success with your resolution. Some ways to be successful include "stimulus control--for example, avoiding a smoky bar after resolving to quit smoking--and reinforcement, or behaviorally contingent rewards," planning ahead of time, and avoid high-risk situations. Norcross also stated that self-efficiency, " the belief that one can effect and maintain change" and the willingness to accept change helps to predict whether or not you will be able to complete your goal.
These behavior changing techniques are part of the transtheoretical model (TTM) of behavior change. I thought it was interesting how the behavior changing model used in clinical programs is also very applicable to self-initiated change. As I begin to work on my New Year's resolution, I am going to try to use some of the tactics mentioned in this article in order to achieve my goal. Norcross' research has concluded that "nearly 60 percent of people will drop their resolutions by the six-month mark, perhaps due to the persistence of old habits as well as reversion to earlier stages of behavior change."
In the article, psychology professor John Norcross shares the ways in which to have most success with your resolution. Some ways to be successful include "stimulus control--for example, avoiding a smoky bar after resolving to quit smoking--and reinforcement, or behaviorally contingent rewards," planning ahead of time, and avoid high-risk situations. Norcross also stated that self-efficiency, " the belief that one can effect and maintain change" and the willingness to accept change helps to predict whether or not you will be able to complete your goal.

What was your resolution this year? How will you achieve your goal? Do you think the techniques that Norcross discusses would work in order to help you achieve your goal? What other techniques can you think of to help achieve your goal?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)